Kenya’s education system could be headed for one of its biggest structural shifts in years if the Basic Education Bill, 2026 is signed into law. The proposed legislation would give formal legal status to the comprehensive school model, a structure already taking shape informally under the Competency Based Curriculum (CBC).
Published by the National Assembly on 24 July 2026, the Bill is designed to repeal and replace the current Basic Education Act (Cap. 211). Its most far-reaching change is not just a matter of updated terminology — it would legally end the practice of running primary and junior school as two separate institutions, even when they share the same compound. Instead, the two levels would be folded into one institution, governed by a single Board of Management (BOM) and funded through a single arrangement.
This isn’t coming out of nowhere. Education Cabinet Secretary Julius Ogamba had already signaled that the government intended to merge primary and junior schools into comprehensive institutions, with the change expected to take effect from the next financial year. Under that plan, primary and junior sections would function as parts of a single institution rather than as separate schools competing for their own administrative and financial resources. The Basic Education Bill essentially puts the legal machinery in place to support a transformation that was already underway inside the Ministry of Education.
Perhaps the most consequential feature of the Bill is that it formally recognizes comprehensive schools as part of Kenya’s basic education system — something the CBC rollout had already made necessary in practice, if not yet in law.
Under the old 8-4-4 system, primary and secondary schools were clearly distinct institutions, with secondary education beginning only after learners completed Class Eight. CBC changed that by introducing junior school for Grades 7, 8 and 9, a new stage wedged between primary and senior school.
To accommodate this, the government has largely placed junior school learners inside existing primary school compounds. The result has been a patchwork: many schools now host both primary and junior sections under one roof, but without a clear legal identity that reflects that reality. The new Bill closes that gap by giving the comprehensive school model actual standing in law.
In simple terms, a comprehensive school is one institution that brings together multiple levels of basic education — chiefly primary and junior school — under a shared institutional framework. Once the Bill is implemented, this stops being an improvised administrative workaround and becomes a recognized category of school in its own right.
The practical effect of this change on how schools are run could be significant. At present, even schools that share a single compound often maintain separate administrative identities for their primary and junior sections — separate staffing plans, separate paperwork, separate institutional statuses, despite operating side by side.
The comprehensive school model is meant to do away with that duplication. Primary and junior levels would be treated as components of one comprehensive school rather than as two schools that happen to share a fence line.
This has knock-on effects for planning. With one institutional identity, it becomes easier for the government to plan staffing levels, infrastructure projects, and the distribution of learning materials across the whole school rather than juggling two separate sets of needs. It could also change how a school accounts for the government support and resources it receives, since funding and reporting would be organized around the institution as a whole.
School governance is where the merger becomes especially concrete. Under the proposed model, any institution hosting both primary and junior sections would be overseen by one Board of Management, rather than maintaining separate governance structures for each level.
This is a meaningful departure from current practice, where primary and junior sections — even under the same roof — can end up with parallel oversight arrangements. Centralizing governance under a single BOM means one body would be responsible for the institution’s administration, development plans, infrastructure decisions, and resource use.
For schools that already run primary and junior sections on one compound, this should cut down on duplicated governance work and make decisions easier to coordinate. The head of the institution would similarly carry overall responsibility for running the comprehensive school, while the individual sections would still be able to manage their own academic and administrative day-to-day matters within that larger structure.
Financing is the other major piece of the puzzle. School funding in Kenya has traditionally been organized institution by institution — but under the comprehensive school model, primary and junior levels sharing a campus would be funded as a single unit.
This matters because it changes how the government identifies and meets a school’s overall needs — classrooms, laboratories, ICT equipment, furniture, sanitation, and learning materials — by looking at the institution as a whole rather than splitting the picture between two notionally separate schools. It should also reduce cases where two sections of what is really one school end up being treated as unrelated entities during development planning.
That said, the fine print of how the new funding model will actually work in practice — the formulas, timelines, and disbursement mechanisms — will depend on regulations developed after the law is passed, not on the Bill’s text alone.
None of this is a surprise to anyone following the Ministry of Education’s public statements. CS Julius Ogamba had already indicated that primary and junior schools would be merged into single institutions starting in the next financial year, well before this Bill was published. The legislation therefore isn’t introducing a brand-new idea so much as giving an already-announced policy the legal foundation it needs to stick.
Practically, a primary school currently hosting junior school learners would transition into becoming a comprehensive institution, rather than continuing to be treated as two separate schools sharing space. The implications stretch across staffing, infrastructure planning, financing, and accountability structures — all of which will need to be reworked to match the new institutional reality.
The push toward comprehensive schools traces directly back to how junior secondary education was rolled out under CBC. When Grade 7 was introduced, thousands of learners were simply absorbed into existing primary school buildings — a quick fix that solved a space problem but created an administrative one. Learners at both levels shared classrooms, teachers, and facilities, yet remained, on paper, part of separate institutional structures.
The government has been trying to resolve that mismatch for a while now. By giving comprehensive schools formal legal recognition, the Bill provides a clearer institutional identity for schools that are, in effect, already operating this way. It’s less a new policy than a legal catch-up with existing practice.
The comprehensive school proposal sits within a much larger rewrite of Kenya’s education law. The Bill aims to align the legal framework with the CBC structure as a whole, defining basic education as running from pre-primary through primary, junior school, and senior school, with senior school covering Grades 10 to 12. That’s a clear break from the language and structure built around the old 8-4-4 system.
The legislation also makes room for other, newer forms of schooling — including mobile schools, multipurpose development institutions, academic centres for gifted and talented learners, and comprehensive schools themselves.
Even though comprehensive schools would operate as single institutions, school leadership roles remain intact. The Bill continues to provide for a Board of Management and a Head of Institution responsible for day-to-day running of the school. What changes is the scope: instead of separate leadership structures for primary and junior sections, there would be one overarching institutional leadership.
As comprehensive schools grow into larger institutions spanning more grades, there may be increased need for additional deputies, administrators, and senior teachers to support the head of institution — meaning the government will need to think carefully about staffing alongside the institutional restructuring.
Beyond restructuring schools, the Bill strengthens protections around the constitutional right to free and compulsory basic education under Article 53(1)(b). It bars public schools from charging tuition and backs that prohibition with real penalties: anyone found charging illegal tuition could face a fine of up to KSh 1 million, up to three years in prison, or both.
Other charges would need proper authorization and receipting, and learners could not be barred from lessons simply because a parent hasn’t paid an unauthorized fee. In effect, the Bill turns illegal levies from an administrative infraction into a serious legal matter.
The Bill doesn’t stop at schools and government — it also places legal obligations on parents and guardians to ensure children actually attend school. A parent who deliberately keeps a child out of school, whether for work, income generation, family disputes, or cultural reasons, could face a fine of up to KSh 5 million or up to five years in prison, or both, in certain circumstances. Failing to enroll a child, or ensure their continued attendance, could also carry penalties. The underlying message: education is framed as both a right and a shared obligation among government, schools, parents, and communities.
The Bill also proposes changes to how children are admitted to school. Entrance exams for admission to basic education institutions would be banned, as would discrimination based on ethnicity, sex, religion, disability, or language. A child could not be turned away simply for lacking a birth certificate. Where admission is wrongly denied, parents would be able to complain to the County Education Board, which must rule within 14 days, with further appeals possible through the Education Appeals Tribunal.
The Bill also tries to draw clearer lines between national and county government responsibilities. The national government, through the Cabinet Secretary, would retain oversight of policy, standards, curriculum, registration, and administration across primary, junior, and senior school levels, while counties would remain responsible for pre-primary education. County Education Boards would coordinate implementation locally, monitor curriculum delivery, and oversee programmes like school feeding.
The legislation strengthens the legal footing for special needs education, tying it to constitutional disability rights and requiring better data collection on learners with special needs. It provides for the Kenya Institute of Special Education and Education Assessment and Resource Centres, and recognizes integrated schools where learners with special needs study alongside their peers.
On oversight, the Bill creates a statutory Director of Schools Inspections, backed by inspectors empowered to review curriculum delivery, assessment practices, financial management, and governance — aimed at tightening accountability across the system.
It also tackles the current fragmentation of scholarships and bursaries by requiring a coordinated system tracking providers, beneficiaries, and amounts disbursed, feeding into the broader Kenya Education Management Information System (KEMIS).
Since the Bill would repeal the existing Basic Education Act, it includes transitional provisions covering existing institutions, assets, employees, and pending legal matters, to ensure continuity as schools shift into the new comprehensive framework rather than falling into an administrative gap.
Of everything in the Bill, the comprehensive school model may end up being the most visible change on the ground. It signals a shift away from treating primary and junior school as fully independent institutions and toward a single, unified structure. For schools already hosting both levels, that means one institution, one Board of Management, one funding stream, and — ideally — more coordinated planning for infrastructure, staffing, and learning resources.
Taken together, the Basic Education Bill, 2026 is more than a legal rebrand of an old statute. It’s an attempt to build a legal framework around an education system — CBC — that has already been operating for years without one. At its center is the comprehensive school model, which CS Julius Ogamba had already flagged as government policy ahead of the next financial year. Alongside that structural shift, the Bill toughens penalties for illegal school charges, strengthens protections for learners and families, clarifies government responsibilities, expands the legal basis for special needs education, tightens inspection standards, and tries to bring order to how scholarships and bursaries are managed.
If it passes, the Bill would represent a substantial legal reset for Kenya’s basic education sector — retiring a framework built for the 8-4-4 era in favor of one designed around CBC, comprehensive schools, and a more tightly integrated basic education system.
New Bill Sets KSh1 Million Penalty for Illegal Tuition Charges in Schools Kenya’s education sector…
Ministry of Education Extends Grade 10 Selection Exercise as KEMIS Portal Remains Accessible to Schools…
The Quiet Pivot: Why Private Schools Are Relying on P1 Teachers for Junior Secondary The…
High Stakes in Education: Inside the 2026 TNA Survey, the Scrapping of CPG, and Teachers'…
No Fresh Intake into Teacher Training Colleges This September as Three-Year Freeze Begins Kenya's Teacher…
KNEC Reopens CBA Portal for KPSEA and KJSEA Candidates as Schools Get Fresh Window to…